Why Pakistani Judiciary is among the Worst performing institutions around the World
The judiciary in Pakistan has long been criticized for its poor performance and lack of independence. There are several reasons why the judiciary in Pakistan is considered to be among the worst performing institutions in the world.
Firstly, the judiciary in Pakistan has historically been subject to political influence and interference. This has often resulted in judges being appointed based on political affiliations rather than merit, and in some cases, judges being removed from office for making decisions that are not in line with the government’s interests. This has led to a lack of trust in the judiciary, with many Pakistanis believing that courts are not impartial and that justice is not always served.
Secondly, the judicial system in Pakistan is often criticized for being slow and inefficient. The backlog of cases in the courts is enormous, and it can take years for cases to be resolved. This is partly due to a lack of resources and infrastructure, but also due to corruption and inefficiency within the system. As a result, many people in Pakistan do not have access to justice, particularly those who are poor or marginalized.
Thirdly, there are concerns about the quality of judges in Pakistan. While there are many highly qualified and competent judges in the country, there are also reports of judges who lack the necessary legal expertise or who are corrupt. This has led to a lack of confidence in the judiciary, with many people believing that the courts are not capable of delivering justice.
Finally, there are also concerns about the lack of accountability within the judiciary in Pakistan. Judges are often seen as being immune from criticism or punishment, and there have been cases of judges engaging in misconduct or corruption without facing any consequences. This lack of accountability has further eroded public trust in the judiciary.
There have been several high-profile cases in Pakistan where the judiciary has been criticized for failing to deliver justice or protect the rights of citizens. Here are a few examples:
- Mukhtaran Mai case: In 2002, Mukhtaran Mai, a woman from a rural village in Punjab, was gang-raped on the orders of a local council. Despite the international attention the case received, the Pakistani courts acquitted most of the accused and only one person was convicted. This led to widespread criticism of the Pakistani judiciary for failing to protect the rights of women and marginalized communities.
- Salmaan Taseer murder case: In 2011, Salmaan Taseer, the governor of Punjab, was assassinated by one of his own bodyguards after he spoke out against Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. The killer was later hailed as a hero by some Islamist groups, and the case raised questions about the judiciary’s ability to prosecute cases involving religious extremism.
- Missing persons case: There have been numerous cases of forced disappearances in Pakistan, where individuals are taken into custody by security forces without due process or trial. The families of the missing persons have petitioned the courts for justice, but the judiciary has been criticized for failing to provide adequate remedies or hold the security forces accountable.
- Asia Bibi blasphemy case: In 2010, Asia Bibi, a Christian woman, was accused of blasphemy and sentenced to death. Despite international pressure, the Pakistani courts upheld her conviction for several years, until the Supreme Court finally overturned the conviction in 2018. The case raised questions about the Pakistani judiciary’s independence and impartiality in cases involving blasphemy.
Overall, the judiciary in Pakistan is facing a range of challenges that are contributing to its poor performance and lack of independence. Addressing these challenges will require significant reforms to ensure that the judiciary is impartial, efficient, and accountable, and that it is able to deliver justice to all citizens of Pakistan.
What reforms are being proposed to address the challenges facing the judiciary in Pakistan?
There have been several proposals for reforms to address the challenges facing the judiciary in Pakistan. These proposals have been put forth by a variety of stakeholders, including civil society organizations, legal experts, and political parties. Some of the key reforms being proposed include:
- Judicial independence: Many reformers believe that the most important change that needs to be made is to ensure the independence of the judiciary. This would require measures to prevent political interference in the appointment of judges, as well as steps to protect judges from retaliation or removal for making decisions that are not in line with the government’s interests.
- Improving efficiency: There have been calls to improve the efficiency of the judicial system in Pakistan. This could involve increasing the number of judges, improving court infrastructure, and introducing technology to streamline court processes. Additionally, some reformers have proposed alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation or arbitration, to reduce the burden on the courts.
- Enhancing accountability: To address concerns about the lack of accountability within the judiciary, some reformers have proposed measures to hold judges accountable for misconduct or corruption. This could include establishing an independent judicial disciplinary body or strengthening existing oversight mechanisms.
- Legal education and training: There have been calls to improve the quality of judges in Pakistan by enhancing legal education and training. This could involve increasing the number of law schools in the country, providing ongoing training and professional development for judges, and promoting a culture of excellence and integrity within the judiciary.
- Public awareness and participation: Finally, some reformers have proposed measures to increase public awareness and participation in the judicial system. This could involve measures to increase access to justice for marginalized communities, such as the provision of legal aid or the establishment of community-based legal clinics. It could also involve efforts to improve transparency and accountability within the judiciary, such as by publishing court decisions or holding public consultations on judicial reform.
Overall, there is a growing recognition in Pakistan that significant reforms are needed to address the challenges facing the judiciary. While there is much debate about the specific measures that should be taken, there is broad agreement that reforms are necessary to ensure that the judiciary is able to deliver impartial, efficient, and accountable justice to all citizens of Pakistan.