Twitter CEO defends Trump ban, acknowledges dangerous precedent | CBC News

Twitter CEO defends Trump ban, acknowledges harmful precedent | CBC News

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey defended his firm’s ban of U.S. President Donald Trump in a philosophical Twitter thread that’s his first public assertion on the topic.

When Trump incited his followers to storm the U.S. Capitol final week, then continued to tweet doubtlessly ominous messages, Dorsey stated the ensuing danger to public security created an “extraordinary and untenable circumstance” for the corporate. Having already briefly suspended Trump’s account the day of the Capitol riot, Twitter on Friday banned Trump totally, then smacked down the president’s makes an attempt to tweet utilizing different accounts.

“I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter,” Dorsey wrote. But he stated: “I believe this was the right decision for Twitter.”

Dorsey acknowledged that exhibits of power just like the Trump ban might set harmful precedents, even calling them an indication of “failure.” Although not in so many phrases, Dorsey urged that Twitter wants to search out methods to keep away from having to make such selections within the first place. Exactly how that might work is not clear, though it might vary from earlier and more practical moderation to a elementary restructuring of social networks.

In Dorsey-speak, meaning Twitter must work tougher to “promote healthy conversation.”

Extreme measures corresponding to banning Trump additionally spotlight the extraordinary energy that Twitter and different Big Tech corporations can wield with out accountability or recourse, Dorsey wrote.

Dorsey cautions towards an excessive amount of management by Big Tech

While Twitter was grappling with the issue of Trump, as an illustration, Apple, Google and Amazon had been successfully shutting down the right-wing website Parler by denying it entry to app shops and cloud-hosting providers. The corporations charged that Parler wasn’t aggressive sufficient about eradicating calls to violence, which Parler has denied.

Dorsey declined to criticize his Big Tech counterparts immediately, even noting that “this moment in time might call for this dynamic.” Over the long run, nevertheless, he urged that aggressive and domineering behaviour might threaten the “noble purpose and ideals” of the open web by entrenching the facility of some organizations over a commons that ought to be accessible to everybody.

The Twitter co-founder, nevertheless, had little particular to say about how his platform or different Big Tech corporations might keep away from such decisions sooner or later. Instead, he touched on an concept that, taken actually, sounds a bit like the top of Twitter itself β€” a long-term challenge to develop a technological “standard” that would liberate social networks from centralized management by the likes of Facebook and Twitter.

But for the second, Dorsey wrote, Twitter’s purpose “is to disarm as much as we can, and ensure we are all building towards a greater common understanding, and a more peaceful existence on earth.”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: